Screener
ZFEB vs RPV
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February vs Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Key differences
- RPV costs 0.44% less per year.
- RPV is significantly larger than ZFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZFEB is classified as alternative, while RPV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ZFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; RPV uses index tracking.
- RPV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZFEB | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.33% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.4% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.23% | 12.76% |
| Max drawdown | -3.00% | -50.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZFEB and RPV
Explore further