Screener
ZFEB vs RWL
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February vs Invesco S&P 500 Revenue ETF
Key differences
- RWL costs 0.40% less per year.
- RWL is significantly larger than ZFEB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZFEB is classified as alternative, while RWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ZFEB follows a structured outcome strategy; RWL uses index tracking.
- RWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZFEB | RWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $163M | $8.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.4% | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.23% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -3.00% | -36.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZFEB and RWL
Explore further