Screener
ZHOG vs MAGO
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
- ZHOG costs 0.56% less per year.
- ZHOG is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ZHOG is classified as fixed income, while MAGO is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ZHOG follows a active selection strategy; MAGO uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| ZHOG | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.43% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $45M | $2M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.60% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.61% | — |
| Max drawdown | -3.66% | -17.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ZHOG and MAGO
Explore further