Screener
AAXJ vs ADVE
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.07% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; ADVE uses active selection.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | ADVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $9M |
| Since | 2008 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +38.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 16.71% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -18.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and ADVE
Explore further