Screener
AAXJ vs MINV
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.07% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than MINV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AAXJ follows a index tracking strategy; MINV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MINV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | MINV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $3.8B | $143M |
| Since | 2008 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.0% | +81.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.3% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.97 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.80% | 24.43% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -23.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AAXJ and MINV
Explore further