Screener
AAXJ vs ECNS
iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both AAXJ and ECNS are equity ETFs. AAXJ charges 0.72% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- AAXJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- ECNS costs 0.13% less per year.
- AAXJ is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| AAXJ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.0B | $71M |
| Since | 2008 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.41% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.5% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.5% | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.53% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -44.52% | -63.44% |
Similar to AAXJ and ECNS
Explore further