Screener
ADVE vs AAXJ
Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- AAXJ costs 0.07% less per year.
- AAXJ is significantly larger than ADVE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ADVE follows a active selection strategy; AAXJ uses index tracking.
- AAXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ADVE | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $3.8B |
| Since | 2023 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 2.60% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.71% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -18.41% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ADVE and AAXJ
Explore further