Screener
AFOS vs ROBO
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF vs Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Key differences
- AFOS costs 0.50% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than AFOS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- AFOS covers north america markets; ROBO covers global.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFOS | ROBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $272M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +57.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.95% |
| Max drawdown | -11.52% | -43.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFOS and ROBO
Explore further