Screener
AFOS vs THNQ
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF vs Robo Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
Key differences
- AFOS costs 0.23% less per year.
- AFOS follows a active selection strategy; THNQ uses index tracking.
- THNQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| AFOS | THNQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $272M | $322M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +71.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +17.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 26.07% |
| Max drawdown | -11.52% | -50.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to AFOS and THNQ
Explore further