Screener
ANEW vs CNQQ
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and CNQQ are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and CNQQ 0.75%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.30% less per year.
- ANEW costs 0.30% less per year.
- CNQQ is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ANEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | CNQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $26M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | — |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -17.82% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.