Screener
ANEW vs CNYA
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and CNYA are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.15% less per year.
- ANEW costs 0.15% less per year.
- CNYA is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $242M |
| Since | 2020 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 1.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +31.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +10.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | -1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.38 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 17.67% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -49.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.