Screener
ANEW vs EFG
ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
Key differences
Both ANEW and EFG are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and EFG 0.34%. The main difference: EFG costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFG costs 0.11% less per year.
- EFG is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ANEW | EFG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $15.9B |
| Since | 2020 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.61% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.8% | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.8% | +10.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.5% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.47% | 17.41% |
| Max drawdown | -39.87% | -35.78% |
Similar to ANEW and EFG
Explore further