Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ANEW vs EWH

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$8M

EWH

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$1.1B

Key differences

Both ANEW and EWH are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and EWH 0.50%. The main difference: EWH is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

  • EWH is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EWH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ANEWEWH
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$8M$1.1B
Since20201996
Dividend yield0.61%4.78%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacific
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+2.8%+18.4%
CAGR 3Y+13.8%+9.7%
CAGR 5Y+3.5%-1.3%
Sharpe 3Y0.680.38
Volatility 1Y13.47%16.60%
Max drawdown-39.87%-42.71%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ANEW and EWH