Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ANEW vs MCHI

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF vs iShares MSCI China ETF

ANEW

ProShares MSCI Transformational Changes ETF

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$8M

MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$6.3B

Key differences

Both ANEW and MCHI are equity ETFs. ANEW charges 0.45% a year and MCHI 0.59%. The main difference: ANEW costs 0.14% less per year.

  • ANEW costs 0.14% less per year.
  • MCHI is much larger than ANEW. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, ANEW has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • MCHI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ANEWMCHI
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$8M$6.3B
Since20202011
Dividend yield0.61%2.30%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacific
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+2.8%+1.6%
CAGR 3Y+13.8%+10.9%
CAGR 5Y+3.5%-5.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.680.38
Volatility 1Y13.47%20.20%
Max drawdown-39.87%-62.84%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to ANEW and MCHI