Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APIE vs MEMX

ActivePassive International Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

APIE

ActivePassive International Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.45%

Fund size

$1.0B

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$45M

Key differences

  • APIE costs 0.34% less per year.
  • APIE is significantly larger than MEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • APIE covers global markets; MEMX covers emerging markets.
  • Over the last 3 years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

APIEMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.45%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$1.0B$45M
Since20232023
Dividend yield3.51%1.72%
Asset classequityequity
Regionglobalemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+22.7%+62.2%
CAGR 3Y+17.2%+25.6%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.821.20
Volatility 1Y16.13%21.07%
Max drawdown-15.94%-19.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APIE and MEMX