Skip to content
Screener

APMU vs BOND

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF vs PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$232M

BOND

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund

Annual cost

0.54%

Fund size

$8.0B

Key differences

Both APMU and BOND are fixed income ETFs. APMU charges 0.35% a year and BOND 0.54%. The main difference: APMU costs 0.19% less per year.

  • APMU costs 0.19% less per year.
  • BOND is much larger than APMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

APMUBOND
Annual cost (TER)0.35%0.54%
Fund size (AUM)$232M$8.0B
Since20232012
Dividend yield2.65%5.15%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+4.1%+6.3%
CAGR 3Y+3.0%+5.3%
CAGR 5YN/A+0.6%
Sharpe 3Y-0.220.32
Volatility 1Y2.40%3.96%
Max drawdown-4.39%-19.71%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to APMU and BOND