Screener
BOND vs SMMU
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- SMMU costs 0.19% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than SMMU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOND follows a active selection strategy; SMMU uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | SMMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $1.1B |
| Since | 2012 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 2.79% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +3.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | -0.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.00% | 1.03% |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -5.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and SMMU
Explore further