Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

APUE vs MEM

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

APUE

ActivePassive U.S. Equity ETF

Active Passive Funds

Annual cost

0.31%

Fund size

$2.4B

MEM

Matthews Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF

Matthews Asia Funds

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$53M

Key differences

  • APUE costs 0.48% less per year.
  • APUE is significantly larger than MEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

APUEMEM
Annual cost (TER)0.31%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$2.4B$53M
Since20232022
Dividend yield0.79%3.06%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+30.2%+52.4%
CAGR 3Y+22.9%+23.2%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.241.04
Volatility 1Y12.36%20.59%
Max drawdown-18.83%-19.10%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to APUE and MEM