Screener
ASEA vs EMBD
Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
ASEA is an equity ETF, while EMBD is a fixed income ETF. ASEA charges 0.65% a year and EMBD 0.39%.
- ASEA is an equity fund, while EMBD is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ASEA follows a index tracking strategy; EMBD uses active selection.
- ASEA covers the Asia-Pacific region; EMBD covers emerging markets.
- EMBD costs 0.26% less per year.
- Over the last three years, ASEA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ASEA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASEA | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $97M | $256M |
| Since | 2011 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +9.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.2% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +2.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.17% | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -44.16% | -24.27% |
Similar to ASEA and EMBD
Explore further