Screener
EMBD vs GEME
Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF vs Pacific NoS Global EM Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.36% less per year.
- EMBD is classified as fixed income, while GEME is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMBD | GEME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $256M | $265M |
| Since | 2020 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 5.67% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.9% | +72.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.04% | 20.99% |
| Max drawdown | -24.27% | -16.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMBD and GEME
Explore further