Screener
ASIA vs EPP
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EPP costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than ASIA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASIA covers asia pacific markets; EPP covers global.
- ASIA follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 14.54% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -39.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and EPP
Explore further