Screener
ASIA vs IPAC
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
Key differences
- IPAC costs 0.70% less per year.
- IPAC is significantly larger than ASIA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASIA follows a active selection strategy; IPAC uses index tracking.
- IPAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2023 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +29.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 16.58% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -31.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and IPAC
Explore further