Screener
ASIA vs VPL
Matthews Pacific Tiger Active ETF vs Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund
Key differences
- VPL costs 0.72% less per year.
- VPL is significantly larger than ASIA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ASIA follows a active selection strategy; VPL uses index tracking.
- VPL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ASIA | VPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $50M | $13.1B |
| Since | 2023 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 2.99% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +55.9% | +49.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.99 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.89% | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -23.95% | -33.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ASIA and VPL
Explore further