Screener
BAIV vs EMBD
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMBD costs 0.21% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while EMBD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; EMBD covers emerging markets.
- EMBD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | EMBD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $256M |
| Since | 2026 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.67% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.85 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.04% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and EMBD
Explore further