Screener
BAIV vs EMHC
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- EMHC costs 0.37% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while EMHC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; EMHC covers emerging markets.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; EMHC uses index tracking.
- EMHC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | EMHC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $252M |
| Since | 2026 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.13% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 5.43% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -28.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and EMHC
Explore further