Screener
BAIV vs EBND
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
Key differences
- EBND costs 0.30% less per year.
- EBND is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while EBND is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; EBND covers emerging markets.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; EBND uses index tracking.
- EBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | EBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2026 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.72% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -29.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and EBND
Explore further