Screener
BAIV vs EMTL
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
Key differences
- BAIV costs 0.05% less per year.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while EMTL is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; EMTL covers emerging markets.
- BAIV follows a active selection strategy; EMTL uses index tracking.
- EMTL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | EMTL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $90M |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.99% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.22% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -22.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and EMTL
Explore further