Screener
BAIV vs VRIG
Brown Advisory International Value Select ETF vs Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF
Key differences
- VRIG costs 0.30% less per year.
- VRIG is significantly larger than BAIV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BAIV is classified as equity, while VRIG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- BAIV covers global markets; VRIG covers north america.
- VRIG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BAIV | VRIG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $95M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.86% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.50% |
| Max drawdown | -11.41% | -13.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BAIV and VRIG
Explore further