Screener
BCLO vs QLTA
iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF vs iShares Aaa - A Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- QLTA costs 0.30% less per year.
- QLTA is significantly larger than BCLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BCLO follows a active selection strategy; QLTA uses index tracking.
- QLTA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BCLO | QLTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.45% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $74M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.76% | 4.42% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.09% | 4.44% |
| Max drawdown | -4.46% | -22.27% |
Similar to BCLO and QLTA
Explore further