Screener
BIBL vs FELC
Inspire 100 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FELC costs 0.17% less per year.
- FELC is significantly larger than BIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BIBL follows a index tracking strategy; FELC uses active selection.
- FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | FELC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $7.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +31.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.49% | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -18.59% |
Similar to BIBL and FELC
Explore further