Screener
BIBL vs FESM
Inspire 100 ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Small Cap Core ETF
Key differences
- FESM costs 0.07% less per year.
- FESM is significantly larger than BIBL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BIBL follows a index tracking strategy; FESM uses index enhanced.
- FESM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BIBL | FESM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $436M | $5.0B |
| Since | 2017 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.00% | 0.55% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.8% | +52.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.49% | 19.05% |
| Max drawdown | -36.12% | -26.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BIBL and FESM
Explore further