Skip to content
Screener

BOND vs APMU

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

BOND

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund

Annual cost

0.54%

Fund size

$8.0B

APMU

ActivePassive Intermediate Municipal Bond ETF

Annual cost

0.35%

Fund size

$232M

Key differences

Both BOND and APMU are fixed income ETFs. BOND charges 0.54% a year and APMU 0.35%. The main difference: APMU costs 0.19% less per year.

  • APMU costs 0.19% less per year.
  • BOND is much larger than APMU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, BOND has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BONDAPMU
Annual cost (TER)0.54%0.35%
Fund size (AUM)$8.0B$232M
Since20122023
Dividend yield5.15%2.65%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+6.3%+4.1%
CAGR 3Y+5.3%+3.0%
CAGR 5Y+0.6%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.32-0.22
Volatility 1Y3.96%2.40%
Max drawdown-19.71%-4.39%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to BOND and APMU