Screener
BOND vs MINO
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund vs PIMCO Municipal Income Opportunities Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Key differences
- MINO costs 0.15% less per year.
- BOND is significantly larger than MINO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOND follows a active selection strategy; MINO uses index tracking.
- BOND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOND | MINO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.9B | $623M |
| Since | 2012 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.17% | 3.83% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.1% | +6.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +0.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.23 | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.00% | 2.67% |
| Max drawdown | -19.71% | -15.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOND and MINO
Explore further