Screener
BOUT vs MARS
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF vs Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.05% less per year.
- BOUT is classified as alternative, while MARS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BOUT follows a structured outcome strategy; MARS uses active selection.
- BOUT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOUT | MARS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $29M |
| Since | 2018 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.75% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.75% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOUT and MARS
Explore further