Screener
BOUT vs QDTE
Innovator IBD Breakout Opportunities ETF vs Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- BOUT costs 0.16% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than BOUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- BOUT follows a structured outcome strategy; QDTE uses option income.
- BOUT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BOUT | QDTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $828M |
| Since | 2018 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 45.82% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.1% | +42.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.75% | 14.95% |
| Max drawdown | -36.75% | -22.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BOUT and QDTE
Explore further