Screener
MARS vs FFTY
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF vs CapForce IBD 50 ETF
Key differences
- MARS costs 0.05% less per year.
- FFTY is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MARS follows a active selection strategy; FFTY uses index tracking.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MARS | FFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $88M |
| Since | 2026 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 34.09% |
| Max drawdown | -13.96% | -59.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MARS and FFTY
Explore further