Screener
QDTE vs FFTY
Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF vs CapForce IBD 50 ETF
Key differences
- FFTY costs 0.16% less per year.
- QDTE is significantly larger than FFTY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- QDTE is classified as alternative, while FFTY is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- QDTE follows a option income strategy; FFTY uses index tracking.
- FFTY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QDTE | FFTY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.96% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $828M | $88M |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 45.82% | 1.23% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.8% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.95% | 34.09% |
| Max drawdown | -22.86% | -59.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to QDTE and FFTY
Explore further