Screener
BREM vs EMM
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- BREM costs 0.16% less per year.
- BREM is classified as fixed income, while EMM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- BREM follows a index tracking strategy; EMM uses active selection.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| BREM | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $38M | $58M |
| Since | 2025 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.76% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +54.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.25% |
| Max drawdown | -4.54% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to BREM and EMM
Explore further