Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BTGD vs GLTR

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

BTGD

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

Annual cost

1.05%

Fund size

$55M

GLTR

abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$2.9B

Key differences

BTGD is an alternative ETF, while GLTR is a commodity ETF. BTGD charges 1.05% a year and GLTR 0.60%.

  • BTGD is an alternative fund, while GLTR is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • GLTR costs 0.45% less per year.
  • GLTR is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • GLTR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BTGDGLTR
Annual cost (TER)1.05%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$55M$2.9B
Since20242010
Dividend yield4.08%0.00%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y-37.2%+45.5%
CAGR 3YN/A+30.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+14.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.01
Volatility 1Y55.77%37.97%
Max drawdown-53.31%-30.10%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BTGD and GLTR