Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

BTGD vs SIVR

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF vs abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

BTGD

STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF

Annual cost

1.05%

Fund size

$55M

SIVR

abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF

Annual cost

0.30%

Fund size

$5.2B

Key differences

BTGD is an alternative ETF, while SIVR is a commodity ETF. BTGD charges 1.05% a year and SIVR 0.30%.

  • BTGD is an alternative fund, while SIVR is a commodity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • SIVR costs 0.75% less per year.
  • SIVR is much larger than BTGD. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • SIVR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

BTGDSIVR
Annual cost (TER)1.05%0.30%
Fund size (AUM)$55M$5.2B
Since20242009
Dividend yield4.08%0.00%
Asset classalternativecommodity
Region
Strategymulti strategy
CAGR 1Y-37.2%+96.9%
CAGR 3YN/A+42.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+19.1%
Sharpe 3YN/A0.98
Volatility 1Y55.77%59.44%
Max drawdown-53.31%-42.42%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to BTGD and SIVR