Screener
CARZ vs MOTO
First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- CARZ is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CARZ follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CARZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CARZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CARZ | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $51M | $10M |
| Since | 2011 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.62% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +114.2% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.1% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +18.4% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.13 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.03% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -51.20% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CARZ and MOTO
Explore further