Screener
CEFS vs GAL
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs State Street Global Allocation ETF
Key differences
- GAL costs 2.26% less per year.
- CEFS follows a active selection strategy; GAL uses tactical allocation.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | GAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $307M |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 3.18% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +20.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -28.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and GAL
Explore further