Screener
CEFS vs RLY
Saba Closed-End Funds ETF vs State Street Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
Key differences
- RLY costs 2.11% less per year.
- CEFS is classified as alternative, while RLY is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, CEFS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RLY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEFS | RLY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.61% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $402M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 6.24% | 2.84% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.3% | +33.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.5% | +14.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.7% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.39 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.92% | 10.12% |
| Max drawdown | -38.99% | -34.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEFS and RLY
Explore further