Screener
CGW vs RSPG
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Key differences
- RSPG costs 0.18% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RSPG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $624M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +46.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +19.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +22.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 21.70% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -73.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and RSPG
Explore further