Screener
CGW vs RSPU
Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Utilities ETF
Key differences
- RSPU costs 0.18% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGW | RSPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.58% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $575M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.53% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.5% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.0% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.38% | 13.70% |
| Max drawdown | -35.72% | -36.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGW and RSPU
Explore further