Screener
CNYA vs SCJ
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and SCJ are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- SCJ costs 0.10% less per year.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $245M |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -37.28% |
Similar to CNYA and SCJ
Explore further