Screener
SCJ vs ECNS
iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both SCJ and ECNS are equity ETFs. SCJ charges 0.50% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- SCJ costs 0.09% less per year.
- SCJ is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| SCJ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $245M | $71M |
| Since | 2007 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.70% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.3% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.2% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.91 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.22% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -37.28% | -63.44% |
Similar to SCJ and ECNS
Explore further