Screener
CNYA vs EWJ
iShares MSCI China A ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
Both CNYA and EWJ are equity ETFs. CNYA charges 0.60% a year and EWJ 0.49%. The main difference: CNYA covers emerging markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CNYA covers emerging markets; EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- EWJ costs 0.11% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CNYA | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.60% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $242M | $21.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 1.76% | 3.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.7% | +28.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.3% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.9% | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.67% | 19.84% |
| Max drawdown | -49.48% | -33.14% |
Similar to CNYA and EWJ
Explore further