Screener
CQQQ vs CNYA
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF
Key differences
- CNYA costs 0.05% less per year.
- CQQQ is significantly larger than CNYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CQQQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- CQQQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | CNYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $238M |
| Since | 2009 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 1.80% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 17.18% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -49.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and CNYA
Explore further