Screener
CQQQ vs ECNS
Invesco China Technology ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- ECNS costs 0.06% less per year.
- CQQQ is significantly larger than ECNS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CQQQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CQQQ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $82M |
| Since | 2009 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 2.22% | 6.05% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.3% | +16.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.4% | +6.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.6% | -6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.76% | 20.87% |
| Max drawdown | -73.99% | -63.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CQQQ and ECNS
Explore further